Roman numeral dating
Roman numeral dating - intel me 8 1 updating toolv1 00 01
And compared to the periods before or after, Dark Ages Europe was unimpressive.I’m probably an overly literal person, but whenever I think about dark ages, I think of the modern (and anachronistic for the period in question) association between light, population density, and economic activity: The Dark Ages in Europe were a time when things would have been more towards the North Korean end of that picture.
He didn’t rain dark judgment over hundreds of years of human achievement because of historical evidence of any kind, by the way; his entire argument was based on the general feeling that life sucked absolute weasel scrotum ever since Rome went belly-up. All of those are from after the period 500 – 1000 AD.
This is not exactly a resounding victory for people claiming that the Dark Age had nothing wrong with it except slightly fewer records. It’s historical malpractice to call something “The Dark Ages”. So I assume you also raise a fuss whenever someone talks about Alexander the Great? Periclean Athens might not have been the most virtuous city, but it was certainly one with lasting accomplishments.
Since it is so hard to judge the goodness or badness of historical figures, most of our claims of greatness are claims about impressiveness.
Some people have used it this way, but this is neither how the term’s original inventors intended it, nor how a majority of modern people (historian or otherwise) think of it.
As mentioned above, the idea of a Dark Age was first developed by the late medieval/early Renaissance thinker Petrarch.
And that the people I am disagreeing with are not historians themselves, but other non-historians trying to interpret historians’ work in a popular way that I interpret as wrong.
And that as far as I know The Dark Ages were never a thing.As per Wikipedia: The idea of a Dark Age originated with the Tuscan scholar Petrarch in the 1330s.Writing of the past, he said: “Amidst the errors there shone forth men of genius; no less keen were their eyes, although they were surrounded by darkness and dense gloom”.Very few of the historical terms we use were invented by professional historians, and they are all necessarily based on that person’s opinion that it correctly describes the thing being described.I await people admitting that there was no Cold War, because who is George Orwell to think he can just name an era based on what he feels it was like? Historical periods get their names from random individuals reflecting on them; the names catch on if people agree that they fit. The term “Dark Ages” was originally just supposed to mean that there aren’t many sources describing it, not that the era was bad Nope, wrong.Many other areas during this period had no warring states at all! Huge swathes of the Earth’s land area remained un-Hellenized. Actually, outside of Russia there were no more troubles than usual. Maybe there were a bunch of bad feelings not in the US. The period after 1000 AD did indeed have lots of great accomplishments.